Louisiana is set to restrict noncompetes for physicians, and Minnesota turns its attention to banning most disintermediation (no-poach) agreements for temporary workers.
Five amicus briefs have been filed in the FTC noncompete litigation. Collectively, they highlight arguments similar to those previously made to and erroneously rejected by the FTC.
The NLRB settled its case against the cosmetic services spa, Juvly Aesthetics, for Juvly’s use of noncompetes, no-recruits, no-hire covenants, training repayment agreements, and other obligations that the NLRB alleged constituted an unfair labor practice in violation of the NLRA.
The FTC’s noncompete ban has an exception for senior executives. Chair Khan suggests the exception is broader than stated in the rule. But she does not answer whether partners and LLC members are covered by the ban.
The Federal Trade Commission will host a public webinar on May 14, at 11 AM ET to, as the FTC explains it, “provide an overview of the FTC’s final rule banning noncompetes, which will include information on how to comply with the rule after its effective date.”
We’ve had some developments in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s lawsuit challenging the FTC’s rule. Most interesting is whether an injunction would benefit only disclosed members of the U.S. Chamber and other plaintiff associations.