The FTC extended the March 20 deadline for comments to it’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on noncompetes (the proposed rule to ban noncompete) to April 19.
U.S. Senators Warren and Whitehouse ask the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for information concerning the Chamber’s objection to the FTC’s authority for a proposed ban on noncompetes.
Members of the House Committee on the Judiciary, sent a letter to the FTC challenging the FTC’s authority to promulgate the proposed rule, and demanding that the FTC provide documents and information related to it. Read the details here.
The FTC’s public forum on its proposed rule banning noncompetes was today, and it was a doozy! Here is a summary.
The FTC’s public forum on its proposed rule banning noncompetes was today, and it was a doozy! Here is a summary.
Reminder: the FTC’s “public forum” on its proposed noncompete ban is today from noon to 3:00 PM ET. All the details you need are here.
Reminder: On February 16, 2023 (from noon to 3:00 PM ET), the FTC will be holding a “public forum” on its proposed noncompete ban. Don’t miss it. And, if you are interested in speaking at it, you will need to reserve a spot.
The FTC’s noncompete ban is mentioned in President Biden’s State of the Union. Not surprisingly, we’ve fact-checked it.
On February 16, 2023 (from noon to 3:00 PM ET), the FTC will be holding a “public forum” on its proposed noncompete ban. If you are interested in speaking at it, you will need to reserve a spot.
The deadline to comment on FTC’s proposed rule to ban noncompetes may be extended to May 19. Make sure your voice is heard, whether joining us in our letter or separately.
The FTC’s proposed rule to ban noncompetes will publish in the federal register tomorrow. If you care, you have until March 20 (assuming no extensions) to make sure your voice is heard. You are welcome to join us in our letter.
Forty-seven state legislatures as well as Washington, D.C. – with the approval of Congress – have spent years honing their noncompete laws to fit their local communities and industries. In one fell swoop, three Commissioners at the FTC are proposing to undo all of it. With it, they will also eliminate the use of a broad swath of nondisclosure, nonsolicitation, no-service, no-recruit, and no-hire agreements. Companies have six things they need to do now.
US Rep Spartz sent a brief letter to the FTC raising concerns about the proposed rule to ban noncompetes.
Newly updated criminal penalties for a violation of noncompete law are not enough for Colorado — or maybe they’re too much. Colorado has made sweeping changes to its noncompete law, while scaling back (or at least cleared up ambiguity around) potential criminal liability for using unenforceable noncompetes.
There has been a lot of legislative, regulatory, and judicial activity around noncompetes over the past two months or so. Here is a summary.
As noted in our post, Ask 70 Trade Secret Lawyers and Paralegals about Noncompetes and Get One Opinion, the FTC and DOJ encouraged the submission of public comments following the “Making Competiti...
Once again, we have resounding unanimity on the issues and recommendations to the FTC and DOJ, as they consider whether to regulate (and if so, how) noncompetes, nondisclosure agreements, and other restrictive covenants. 70 lawyers who practice extensively in the area of trade secret and restrictive covenant law agree: federal regulation is likely inappropriate, definitely premature, and, in any event, should be limited.
As we await the FTC and DOJ’s December 6 and 7 Virtual Public Workshop Exploring Competition in Labor Markets, it’s important to know that on November 12, the FTC posted a draft Strategic Plan fo...
The FTC and DOJ will be hosting a two-day workshop on December 6 and 7 covering, among other things, the use of noncompetes and NDAs.
“Non-compete agreements that are unreasonable as to temporal length, subject matter, and/or geographic scope will be found to violate both federal and state antitrust laws.”
That’s new — especially because it’s from Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Christine Wilson.
But, at the end, Commissioner Wilson observed, “The elected officials in each state are best situated to weigh the costs and benefits of non-competes and make decisions tailored to the unique circumstances in their jurisdictions. . . . A federal solution at this time is premature.”
That’s new — especially because it’s from Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Christine Wilson.
But, at the end, Commissioner Wilson observed, “The elected officials in each state are best situated to weigh the costs and benefits of non-competes and make decisions tailored to the unique circumstances in their jurisdictions. . . . A federal solution at this time is premature.”
As we look at recent developments in noncompete regulatory efforts at the state and federal levels, it’s good to have a quick reminder of how we got here. We’ll take a quick tour of noncompete regulation from the Middle Ages to now.
Ask two lawyers for their opinion, and you’ll get three opinions. But I asked 21 lawyers and a paralegal and got only one opinion. That opinion that is set out in a letter we collectively submitte...
Thursday is approaching! As mentioned in our last post on the subject, the FTC will be holding a hearing on January 9, 2020 (at 8:30 a.m. at its Headquarters Building, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,...
*This post was originally published by Erika Hahn and me on Law360 under the title, “Noncompete Misconceptions May Be Inhibiting Reform.” Federalism is alive and well. For about 200 ye...